Product Discontinued · Pixa was discontinued and is no longer available for purchase or download. The app last received updates in 2015 and is incompatible with modern macOS versions.

Recommended alternatives: Eagle, Adobe Bridge, Inboard

Pixa: Mac Image Organization and Asset Management

Mac app for organizing design files, screenshots, and images with tagging and smart folders

Pixa was a Mac app for organizing design files and images. Think of it as a visual file manager that watched folders on your hard drive, automatically cataloging new files with tags, colors, and smart search. Released in the early 2010s for designers drowning in PSDs, PNGs, and inspiration screenshots, Pixa was discontinued around 2015 as cloud tools and Adobe Bridge matured.

Key Specs

   
Price $29.99 one-time (no longer available)
Platform Mac only (macOS 10.10 and earlier)
Best for Local file organization, design asset libraries, screenshots
Learning curve 15 minutes to setup folders and tags

How Designers Used Pixa

Pixa solved organizational chaos for designers managing thousands of local files.

For Organizing Project Assets

Point Pixa at your project folders using Live Folders. Pixa scans and indexes every PSD, AI, Sketch, PNG, and JPG file. As you work, Pixa automatically detects new files and updates the library. Search by filename, color, dimensions, or tags without opening Finder. Drag files directly from Pixa into Photoshop or Sketch. Designers used this to manage client deliverables, stock photos, and work-in-progress files without creating separate asset libraries.

For Managing Design Inspiration

Save web screenshots, Dribbble shots, and design references into a dedicated folder. Pixa watches the folder, auto-tags images by dominant color and size. Create smart folders that show all images tagged “minimalist” or “blue” or “above 1920px wide.” When starting a new project, search your inspiration library instead of re-Googling or scrolling Pinterest. Pixa’s speed came from local indexing: no cloud upload delays.

For Screenshot Management

Capture screenshots using Pixa’s built-in capture tool or macOS screenshots. Pixa automatically tags them by dimensions and color, making them searchable. Designers researching UI patterns or building swipe files used Pixa to catalog hundreds of screenshots without manual filing. Search “1920x1080 blue” to find desktop screenshots with blue color schemes instantly.

For Team Asset Sharing via Dropbox

Point Pixa at a Dropbox folder containing shared design assets. Pixa synced tags using OpenMeta, which traveled with files through Dropbox. When teammates added new assets to the shared folder, Pixa automatically imported them. This created a poor-person’s DAM system before enterprise tools like Bynder existed. Teams working on Macs used this to share icon libraries, brand assets, and templates.

Pixa vs. Current Alternatives

Since Pixa is discontinued, here’s how modern tools compare:

Feature Pixa Eagle Adobe Bridge Inboard
Price $29.99 (discontinued) $29.95 one-time Free w/ CC $49.99 one-time
Platform Mac only Mac, Windows Mac, Windows Mac only
Live Folders ✅ Auto-watch ⚠️ Manual import ⚠️ Manual browse ⚠️ Manual import
File formats ✅ 40+ formats ✅ 80+ formats ✅ Adobe + common ✅ Design-focused
Screenshot tool ✅ Built-in ✅ Built-in ❌ No ❌ No
Cloud sync ⚠️ Via Dropbox ✅ Built-in sync ✅ Creative Cloud ❌ Local only
Tags & search ✅ Color, size, custom ✅ Similar ⚠️ Basic ✅ Similar

Use Eagle if: You want the closest Pixa replacement with modern features, cross-platform support, and active development.

Use Adobe Bridge if: You’re already paying for Creative Cloud and work primarily with Adobe files (PSD, AI, INDD). It’s free and integrated.

Use Inboard if: You want a polished Mac-native app, don’t need Windows compatibility, and appreciate beautiful design in your tools.

What Happened to Pixa

Pixa development stopped around 2015. The developer didn’t announce a formal shutdown, updates just ceased. Apple’s transition to 64-bit-only macOS (starting with Catalina in 2019) made Pixa incompatible with modern systems, and no updates arrived to fix it.

The market shifted: Adobe Bridge became free for Creative Cloud users, offering similar features with better Adobe file support. Cloud-based DAM systems like Dropbox, Google Drive with preview, and enterprise tools like Bynder took enterprise customers. Free tools like macOS Finder with tags and preview covered basic use cases.

The broader pattern: single-developer Mac apps struggle when free alternatives improve and platform compatibility requires constant updates. Pixa’s $30 price felt reasonable in 2013 but couldn’t compete with free Bridge or subscription-based Eagle’s ongoing development.

Alternatives for Image Organization

Here’s where former Pixa users migrated:

For local file management:

  • Eagle ($29.95) closest Pixa replacement with modern features
  • Inboard ($49.99) Mac-native design asset manager
  • Adobe Bridge (free with Creative Cloud) for Adobe-centric workflows

For cloud-based organization:

  • Google Drive with file preview for shared team assets
  • Dropbox with Smart Sync for local-ish file browsing
  • Frame.io for video and design review workflows

For screenshot-specific workflows:

  • CleanShot X ($29/year) advanced screenshot and annotation
  • Shottr (free) fast screenshots with markup
  • macOS Screenshots (Cmd+Shift+4) with Finder tags for organization

For design-specific libraries:

  • Figma Assets panel for managing design system components
  • Sketch Cloud Libraries for shared symbols and styles
  • Abstract for version-controlled design files

For team DAM (digital asset management):

  • Bynder for enterprise teams with large asset libraries
  • Brandfolder for marketing teams managing brand assets
  • Canto for education and nonprofit asset management

The key shift: Pixa combined capture, organization, and search in one app. Modern workflows separate these functions: capture with CleanShot or macOS, organize with Eagle or Bridge, search with Spotlight or dedicated DAM tools. Choose combinations that fit your workflow rather than expecting one tool to do everything.

Frequently Asked Questions